Skip to content

Massachusetts voters reject legalizing psychedelics, approve dropping high school test requirements

330df431f878cf32ba13a34e73ab59f5425d6639c7a445c59cc99bda318d73a4
Voters cast their ballots at a polling place, Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024, in Waltham, Mass. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts voters rejected a measure to legalize some psychedelics, but said yes to dropping comprehensive tests as a requirement for getting a high school diploma. The issues were among five measures put to voters on Tuesday’s ballot. Voters also said yes to auditing the Legislature and no to increasing the minimum hourly wage for workers who collect tips. A fifth ballot measure was too early to call. It would give union rights to drivers for ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft.

Defeated: Legalizing psychedelics

The ballot issue would have allowed residents 21 and older to grow and use plant-based psychedelics in certain circumstances. Two other states have legalized some mind-altering drugs that are considered illegal by the federal government.

The psychedelics in question included psilocybin and psilocyn, both found in so-called “magic mushrooms;” and mescaline, dimethyltryptamine and ibogaine from plants.

Critics of the proposal warned it could lead to a black market. They also argued the centers selling the drugs would not be prevented from giving psychedelics to people considered high risk, like those with schizophrenia, bipolar illness or who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Approved: Dropping a requirement to pass tests for a high school diploma

Until now, Massachusetts students were required to pass comprehensive tests to receive a high school diploma. The ballot issue doesn't get rid of the tests, but stipulates that passing them will no longer be required for graduation.

The Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System tests are given in mathematics, science and technology, and English.

Instead of passing the tests, students will be required to finish coursework certified by the local school district and achieve state academic standards in the subjects.

Teachers unions have been among the strongest critics of using the tests as a graduation requirement, saying that “teaching to the test” limits their ability to give students a fuller education.

Supporters of the tests argued that without the requirement, school districts will adopt lower standards so students can graduate. They said it’s unfair to grant diplomas to students who aren’t ready.

Defeated: Raising the minimum wage for tipped workers

Voters defeated a proposal to gradually increase how much employers must pay workers who collect tips, like servers in restaurants.

The state’s wage for tipped workers is now $6.75 an hour, while the minimum hourly wage for most other workers is $15. Now, if a worker doesn’t earn enough in tips to bring them up to $15 an hour, the employer must make up the difference.

Under the proposal, employers would have been required to pay tipped workers $9.60 an hour beginning Jan. 1, and match the state’s full minimum wage at the start of 2029.

Supporters argued tips should be a reward for good service, not a subsidy for low wages. Critics said the proposal would have reduced overall wages for servers, increased costs for restaurants and patrons and could have forced some neighborhood eateries to close.

Approved: Allowing an audit of the state Legislature

Voters gave the state auditor the power to audit the Legislature.

The ballot measure had been spearheaded by state Auditor Diana DiZoglio, who formerly served in both the state House and Senate. She said passage is a victory for those who want more open state government.

“The people of Massachusetts want the equity, transparency and accountability that a legislative audit would bring,” she said.

Critics had said the question would violate the separation of powers outlined in the Massachusetts Constitution.

Democratic Senate President Karen Spilka and House Speaker Ronald Mariano released a statement saying they will consider “how to best respect the Question 1 election results in a manner that aligns with the fundamental principles of the Massachusetts Constitution, including separation of powers.”

To early to call: Allowing Uber, Lyft drivers to unionize

Drivers for ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft are considered independent contractors who don't have the right to unionize under federal law.

The proposal would allow them to unionize in Massachusetts. Drivers wouldn't be required to participate. On the corporate side, companies would be allowed to join forces through associations that would represent their joint interests in negotiations.

The state would have the right to approve negotiated contracts. The proposal would also create a hearing process when a company or union is charged with an unfair work practice.

Unions pushed for the change despite a settlement announced in June by the state attorney general’s office guaranteeing Uber and Lyft drivers earn a minimum pay standard of $32.50 per hour.

Opponents said the measure will raise prices for riders without directly benefitting drivers and create what they call “a new radical labor category” inconsistent with federal labor law. Critics also say drivers already enjoy benefits, including higher hourly pay and paid sick and family medical leave.

—-

Associated Press journalist Nick Perry contributed to this report from Meredith, New Hampshire.

Steve Leblanc, The Associated Press

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks